63 Prominent Figures Demand Constitution Reform Council Formation Within Deadline

Sixty-three prominent individuals and representatives from various organizations have demanded the formation of a Constitution Reform Council within the stipulated 180-day timeframe, as pledged following the July popular uprising aimed at state reform. They warned that a lack of public mandate and uncertainty in the state reform process could jeopardize the potential for national transformation. The statement, issued on a Thursday, highlighted that instead of utilizing the historic opportunity presented by the July uprising for necessary structural reforms, recent political uncertainty and indecision have created a worrying situation. According to the July National Charter (Constitution Reform) Implementation Order, a Constitution Reform Council was to be established with representatives elected in the 13th National Parliamentary Election. The council's first session was to be convened similarly to the first parliamentary session, within 30 calendar days of the election results. The council was then tasked with completing constitutional reforms within 180 working days from its first session, based on the July National Charter and referendum results. The deadline for convening the council's first session, as per the July order, was March 15, but it was not called by the President. The signatories emphasized that the July uprising was more than a change of government; it was a historical call to rebuild the state, politics, and citizen relations on a new foundation, requiring a clear, inclusive, and democratic process. They expressed concern over the government's recent political stance regarding the proposed council, stressing the need for an effective path to constitutional transformation in light of the uprising's reality and public expectations, without disregarding the parliamentary process. The statement asserted that a system's legitimacy derives not only from electoral processes but also from historical public aspirations, lessons from mass movements, and commitments to state reconstruction, warning that disregarding public will could damage political trust and stability. They also feared that if the state reform process is hindered, undemocratic and reactionary forces could exploit the situation, creating risks for democratic development, institutional stability, and sovereignty. The statement outlined three demands: forming an independent, effective, and representative Constitution Reform Council within 180 days as per the July Charter; respecting the uprising's aspirations and public sovereignty; and maintaining the continuity of state transformation above partisan interests. It also called for active participation from the public, particularly those who believe in the July uprising's spirit and democratic forces, to protect the sacrifices made, honor public will, and build a just state for future generations.