Brazilians Favor Dialogue but Still Resort to Shouting and Physical Discipline for Children
A recent survey conducted by the Instituto Futuro é Infância Saudável (Infinis) in partnership with Quaest reveals a significant disconnect in Brazil between preferred child-rearing methods and actual practices. While 91% of Brazilians advocate for dialogue as the primary strategy for correcting children's behavior, a substantial majority admit to using harsher methods. Specifically, 62% have shouted at a child, 49% have admitted to slapping, and 27% have used objects for physical punishment. The study, which surveyed 2,202 adults across 128 municipalities between May 29 and June 7, 2026, indicates that violent disciplinary practices remain prevalent and socially tolerated.
Furthermore, the research highlights a concerning level of social inaction regarding observed child discipline. A majority of respondents, 62%, stated they would not intervene if they witnessed a child being slapped or having their ear pulled in public, a sentiment similar to the 64% recorded in 2023. This inaction may stem from viewing child-rearing as a private matter or from social discomfort. Despite these practices, 74% of participants believe that violence against children has increased in recent years. The study also noted a slight decrease in reported violent practices compared to 2023, but acknowledges that violence remains normalized across generations.
Beyond disciplinary methods, the survey also explored perceptions of child labor. While education is highly valued, with 93% deeming it a priority, a significant portion of Brazilians find child labor acceptable under certain conditions. For children up to 11 years old, 61% believe it's acceptable to work to avoid being on the streets, and this acceptance rises to 93% for adolescents aged 12-17. Conversely, only 76% of adults reject the notion that work is acceptable solely because parents decree it. Compounding these issues, 71% of respondents could not name any child protection laws, indicating a low awareness of legal safeguards.
This research highlights a persistent societal paradox in Brazil, where stated ideals regarding child discipline diverge sharply from reported actions. The data suggests that while public awareness of child rights and the benefits of dialogue has grown, ingrained cultural norms and potentially generational cycles of physical discipline continue to influence parenting practices. The high rate of social inaction when witnessing public disciplinary incidents points to complex factors including privacy concerns, social norms, and perhaps a lack of confidence in intervention. Furthermore, the juxtaposition of prioritizing education with the acceptance of child labor, particularly under duress, reveals an underlying tension in how societal well-being for children is conceptualized and prioritized. The low recall of child protection laws indicates a significant gap in legal literacy, which may hinder the effective implementation of protective measures and perpetuate cycles of violence. Future interventions could focus on bridging this gap between stated values and practiced behaviors through targeted education campaigns, community support programs, and enhanced legal awareness initiatives.
AI-generated to prompt reflection — not editorial opinion, not advice, not a statement of fact. How this works.