E-cigarettes pose severe health risks, experts warn
An online consultation session hosted by Prothom Alo Trust on April 22, 2026, addressed the public health risks associated with e-cigarettes. Dr. Sardar Atiq, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry at Bangladesh Medical University, provided expert advice during the session, which focused on whether e-cigarettes are a viable alternative to traditional smoking. Dr. Atiq explained that while many perceive e-cigarettes as a safer substitute for regular cigarettes, allowing users to control nicotine levels or even opt for 'zero nicotine' versions, their health risks are comparable. He highlighted that the aromatic chemicals and vapor produced by e-cigarettes can cause significant damage to the lungs. Furthermore, he cautioned that e-cigarettes are drawing in the younger generation, potentially leading to nicotine addiction and a subsequent transition to conventional cigarettes. Dr. Atiq unequivocally stated that complete abstinence from all forms of smoking, including both e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes, is the only way to maintain good health.
The discussion surrounding e-cigarettes often centers on harm reduction compared to traditional tobacco products. However, this expert opinion emphasizes that e-cigarettes introduce their own set of severe health risks, particularly concerning lung damage from chemical vapors and the potential for nicotine addiction, especially among youth. The framing of e-cigarettes as a 'safer alternative' may inadvertently encourage uptake, creating a new generation of dependent users. Public health strategies may need to balance the potential benefits for existing smokers seeking cessation with the risks of initiating new users, particularly adolescents, into nicotine use through appealing flavors and perceived lower harm. Future policy considerations should address the long-term health consequences and the addictive potential of these products, irrespective of nicotine content, to safeguard public health.
AI-generated to prompt reflection — not editorial opinion, not advice, not a statement of fact. How this works.