E. Jean Carroll Receives $5.6 Million After Trump's Appeal Fails
E. Jean Carroll has received over $5.6 million awarded to her in a 2023 sexual abuse and defamation trial against Donald Trump. Funds were released on July 9 from a court-held escrow account after a Manhattan federal court judge, Lewis Kaplan, ordered their disbursement on July 8. This action followed the Supreme Court's denial on June 29 of Trump's request to hear his appeal. Trump had been actively contesting the release of these funds since June 2023. Roberta Kaplan, Carroll's lead lawyer, stated that the jury's verdict finding Trump liable for sexual assault and defamation has now resulted in Carroll receiving her awarded damages. Both legal teams had previously agreed to deposit the jury award into the court's registry investment system (Cris) as an escrow while Trump pursued his appeals. This arrangement stipulated that the funds would be released upon specific legal developments, such as the Supreme Court refusing to hear an appeal. Despite Trump's legal team arguing that the money should remain in escrow pending a reconsideration request, the judge denied their request for more time to respond to Carroll's legal team's demand for release. This case stems from a 2019 New York magazine feature excerpting Carroll's book, where she alleged Trump sexually assaulted her in a department store fitting room decades prior. In a separate 2024 trial, another Manhattan jury awarded Carroll $83.3 million for defamatory remarks Trump made about her during his presidency.
The release of funds from escrow marks a procedural conclusion to the initial judgment against Donald Trump, underscoring the legal framework's capacity to enforce financial awards even against significant opposition. The protracted legal battle highlights the tension between a defendant's right to appeal and the plaintiff's right to receive awarded damages. While Trump's legal strategy aimed to delay or prevent disbursement, the court's adherence to the escrow agreement demonstrates the importance of contractual stipulations in litigation. This event may inform future strategies for defendants seeking to appeal judgments, emphasizing the potential consequences of escrow arrangements and the finality of Supreme Court decisions. The differing outcomes in the two trials also illustrate the distinct legal standards and evidentiary thresholds for sexual abuse and defamation claims, suggesting that public figures face substantial financial risks when making public statements that are later deemed defamatory.
AI-generated to prompt reflection — not editorial opinion, not advice, not a statement of fact. How this works.