eBay fined $55.7M and executives jailed for 2019 harassment campaign against journalists
EBay has been ordered to pay $55.7 million in a civil settlement and several former executives have been sentenced to prison for orchestrating a severe harassment campaign against David and Ina Steiner, editors of the EcommerceBytes newsletter. The campaign began in 2019 after the Steiners published critical articles about EBay. Top company officials, including the CEO and head of security, allegedly directed the harassment, which involved sending the couple disturbing packages. These included items like books on coping with spousal death, a funeral wreath, live insects, and a bloody pig mask. The perpetrators also sent bizarre sexual paraphernalia and pornography to the Steiners' home and workplace, and falsely advertised similar items to their neighbors. An attempt was also made to install a GPS tracker on the Steiners' vehicle to facilitate further harassment. The Steiners reported the incidents to the police, leading to a lengthy investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice. Despite attempts to conceal their actions, seven EBay employees were convicted. Former Head of Security James Baugh received a 57-month prison sentence. In January 2024, EBay reached a $3 million settlement with prosecutors and agreed to implement oversight measures. The final civil settlement with the Steiners was reached in July 2026, marking one of the largest payouts in a corporate harassment case.
This case highlights the severe consequences of corporate retaliation against critical reporting. The extensive and disturbing nature of the harassment campaign demonstrates a profound lapse in corporate governance and ethical conduct at EBay. The prolonged legal process, spanning several years from 2019 to 2026, underscores the challenges in prosecuting and resolving such complex cases involving powerful entities. Moving forward, organizations must establish robust internal controls and ethical frameworks to prevent similar abuses, ensuring that journalistic scrutiny is met with transparency and accountability rather than intimidation. The significant financial penalty and custodial sentences serve as a stark warning regarding the legal and reputational risks associated with retaliatory actions against the press.
AI-generated to prompt reflection — not editorial opinion, not advice, not a statement of fact. How this works.