Face the People Editor Sues Mastul Foundation Over Defamation; DB to Investigate
The publisher and editor of the online news outlet Face the People, Saifur Rahman (Sagar), has filed a defamation lawsuit against the Mastul Foundation. The suit alleges that the foundation disseminated false and distorted audio-visual content on social media, portraying Rahman as a "racketeer." A Dhaka court has accepted the case and ordered the Detective Branch (DB) of police to investigate. The information was confirmed by court sources on Monday. Rahman had filed the case application through his lawyer at the Dhaka Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's Court the previous Wednesday, after which the court directed the DB to conduct the investigation. According to the case documents, the Mastul Foundation's founder and CEO, Kazi Riyaz Rahman, is the primary defendant, along with four other individuals: Abu Mohammad Kamruzzaman, Syeda Priyanka, Kazi Raihan Rahman, and Syed Farhana Yasmin. The lawsuit claims that a video published by Mastul Foundation used edited and distorted audio-visual material to depict Saifur Rahman as a "racketeer," thereby damaging his personal and professional reputation. The complaint further states that the false and distorted content was disseminated on social media in retaliation for an investigative report published by Face the People titled 'Interest Business with Zakat Money, Mastul's Novel Deception,' which questioned the foundation's activities. This report allegedly led to the misrepresentation of Rahman's statements, causing him social and professional harm. Separately, on Sunday, Abu Md. Kamruzzaman of the Mastul Foundation filed a case application against Saifur Rahman and investigative reporter Mohammad Yusuf of Face the People, alleging extortion and defamation. The court accepted this case and ordered the Police Bureau of Investigation (PBI) to investigate.
This situation involves competing legal actions between a digital media outlet and a non-profit foundation, highlighting the challenges of online content regulation and reputational management. The cross-filing of lawsuits suggests a significant dispute over alleged defamation and potentially retaliatory actions following investigative reporting. The core issue appears to be the dissemination of content that one party claims is fabricated and damaging, while the other may be asserting its right to report or respond. Future developments will depend on the thoroughness of the DB and PBI investigations and the subsequent legal proceedings, which could set precedents for how such disputes are handled in the digital sphere, particularly concerning the balance between free expression, investigative journalism, and the protection of reputation against misinformation.
AI-generated to prompt reflection — not editorial opinion, not advice, not a statement of fact. How this works.