Goiás Poll: Daniel Vilela Leads Race with 37%, Marconi Perillo at 21%
A new Quaest poll conducted for Genial Investimentos reveals Daniel Vilela of the MDB party leading the gubernatorial race in Goiás, Brazil, with 37% of voter intentions in a stimulated poll. Trailing Vilela is Marconi Perillo from the PSDB party, securing 21% of the vote. Wilder Morais of the PL party is in third place with 11%. Other candidates include Luis Cesar Bueno (PT) at 3%, Cíntia Dias (Psol) at 1%, and Luciana Amorim (UP) at 0%. The poll also indicates that 20% of voters remain undecided, and 7% plan to cast a blank or null vote, or not vote at all. A significant 56% of respondents believe their vote choice could still change, while 41% consider their decision final. The survey, which interviewed 1,104 eligible voters aged 16 and over between July 24th and 28th, has a margin of error of 3 percentage points and a 95% confidence level. Regarding rejection rates, Marconi Perillo faces the highest at 46%, followed by Wilder Morais at 21% and Daniel Vilela at 20%. Simulated second-round scenarios show Daniel Vilela defeating both Marconi Perillo (52% to 28%) and Wilder Morais (54% to 16%).
This poll data provides a snapshot of voter sentiment in Goiás, highlighting a significant lead for Daniel Vilela and a substantial undecided bloc. The high rejection rate for Marconi Perillo suggests potential challenges in consolidating support, even in a runoff scenario. The considerable portion of voters whose decisions are not yet final indicates that campaign strategies and external events could still influence the outcome. As the election approaches, candidates will need to focus on solidifying their base while effectively appealing to undecided voters and mitigating negative perceptions, particularly concerning those with high rejection figures. The interplay between party affiliations, candidate recognition, and evolving voter preferences will be critical in shaping the final electoral landscape over the coming weeks.
AI-generated to prompt reflection — not editorial opinion, not advice, not a statement of fact. How this works.