Judge: Ample Evidence Contradicts Mompó's Account of Flooding Meeting

A judge has stated that there is "abundant" evidence contradicting the version of events presented by Mompó regarding a meeting. Mompó claimed that only the Forata issue was discussed at the Cecopi (Emergency Coordination Center). The magistrate rejected a request from Argüeso's defense for a face-to-face confrontation with the mayor of Torrent concerning a phone call made on the day of the flood. This ruling suggests the court believes Mompó's account of the Cecopi meeting is not entirely accurate. The judge's decision implies that the conversation on the day of the flood, involving the mayor of Torrent, is relevant to the ongoing investigation. The defense's attempt to reconcile conflicting testimonies through a direct confrontation was denied. This indicates the court is proceeding based on the existing evidence, which it deems sufficient to challenge Mompó's narrative. The case appears to be moving forward with the judge asserting a strong evidentiary basis against Mompó's specific claims about the Cecopi meeting's agenda.