Legal Expert: Even a Flawed Regulatory Body is Better Than None
Rade Đurić, a legal expert from the Independent Association of Journalists of Serbia (NUNS), stated that the formation of the Regulatory Body for Electronic Media (REM) Council is essential. He made these remarks during a live interview on N1 Studio. Đurić believes that even a council with imperfections is preferable to having no regulatory body at all. The establishment of this council is considered necessary after a period of one and a half years. The REM is responsible for overseeing electronic media in Serbia. Its proper functioning is crucial for maintaining media pluralism and ensuring adherence to broadcasting regulations. The absence of a fully functional council for an extended period has raised concerns about the oversight of media content and the protection of public interest in the electronic media sphere. Đurić's statement highlights the urgency and importance of having a functioning regulatory framework in place, despite potential challenges in its composition or operation.
The establishment of regulatory bodies like REM, even with perceived flaws, addresses a fundamental governance gap in the media landscape. The extended period without a fully functional council suggests potential systemic inertia or political challenges in appointing members. From a future-oriented perspective, ensuring the independence and efficacy of such bodies is paramount for fostering a healthy information ecosystem in the AI era. This involves balancing regulatory oversight with the protection of journalistic freedom, a dynamic that will continue to evolve as media consumption shifts and new technologies emerge. The debate over the quality of regulation versus the absence of it underscores the ongoing tension between state control and media autonomy.
AI-generated to prompt reflection — not editorial opinion, not advice, not a statement of fact. How this works.