Mato Grosso Ranks Third in Brazil for Femicide Rates in 2025
Mato Grosso recorded the third-highest femicide rate in Brazil in 2025, with 2.7 victims per 100,000 women, according to the 20th Brazilian Public Security Yearbook released by the Brazilian Public Security Forum. The state reported 54 femicide victims throughout the year, placing it behind only Acre (3.2) and Rondônia (2.9) nationally. Notably, seven women murdered in Mato Grosso in 2025 had active Protective Orders at the time of their deaths. From January to July 2026, the state documented 27 femicide cases, indicating a continued trend. The yearbook also highlighted specific tragic cases, including the shooting death of 24-year-old Jacyra Grampola Gonçalves da Silva in Sorriso by her ex-boyfriend, José Alves dos Santos, 31. Another incident involved the stabbing of 29-year-old Regiane Alves da Silva in Confresa by her husband, Emival Antunes Barbosa, 47, while she held their infant daughter. In Sinop, 33-year-old speech therapist Ana Paula Abreu Carneiro was fatally stabbed by her husband, Lucas França Rodrigues, 22, following a theological discussion.
The reported femicide rates in Mato Grosso for 2025 underscore a critical public safety challenge, with a significant portion of victims having active protective orders, suggesting systemic gaps in enforcement or victim support. The data indicates that despite legal protections, women remain vulnerable, pointing to the need for a multi-faceted approach that addresses not only criminal justice but also societal attitudes and the effectiveness of preventative measures. Examining the correlation between these rates and socio-economic factors, as well as the efficacy of domestic violence intervention programs, will be crucial for developing more robust strategies to combat gender-based violence in the coming decade. The inclusion of theological disputes as a stated motive in one case warrants further investigation into the influence of extremist ideologies on interpersonal violence.
AI-generated to prompt reflection — not editorial opinion, not advice, not a statement of fact. How this works.