Pakistan Court Shifts Blame for Illegal Construction to Sindh Government
The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) in Pakistan has ruled that the Supreme Court overstepped its authority by ordering widespread demolitions of illegal constructions, including the 15-storey Nasla Tower. Senior lawyers and constitutional experts largely agree with the FCC's decision, asserting that the apex court's appellate jurisdiction was not the appropriate venue for such sweeping orders. This fresh verdict now places the responsibility squarely on the Sindh provincial government and its Building Control Authority (SBCA) to regulate and preserve public amenities.
The FCC clarified that its ruling does not legitimize illegal construction but emphasizes that a comprehensive legal framework already exists to address violations. Provincial authorities, particularly the SBCA, are now constitutionally and statutorily bound to supervise, regulate, and ensure the maintenance and accessibility of public amenities for current and future generations. Experts noted that the Supreme Court's previous orders, issued in December 2018 and January 2019, had caused significant disruption and insecurity in the real estate sector, leading investors to leave Karachi. The FCC's judgment underscores that the conversion, regularization, and legalization of land and construction must strictly adhere to existing regulations like the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations 2002 and the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979.
The Federal Constitutional Court's ruling reasserts the principle of separation of powers, clarifying that judicial intervention in urban planning and building law enforcement should not usurp the executive and legislative functions of provincial governments. While the Supreme Court's intent to curb illegal construction and preserve public amenities was likely well-meaning, its broad-stroke demolition orders may have lacked due process and created market instability. The FCC's decision shifts the onus to the Sindh government and SBCA, highlighting the critical need for robust regulatory oversight and enforcement of existing laws. This pivot underscores a systemic challenge: balancing rapid urban development with legal compliance and the protection of public interest, a tension likely to intensify in the coming decade as urbanization accelerates globally. Future governance models will need to integrate transparent, efficient administrative processes with judicial oversight that respects jurisdictional boundaries to prevent such conflicts.
AI-generated to prompt reflection — not editorial opinion, not advice, not a statement of fact. How this works.