Prominent Figures Demand Restoration of Hero's Statue in Jhenaidah
A group of 39 distinguished individuals, including writers, professors, and human rights activists, have expressed strong condemnation and outrage over the attempted demolition of an under-construction statue of Bir Shrestha Hamidur Rahman in Jhenaidah, Bangladesh. They are demanding the immediate and dignified reinstallation of the statue and legal action against those involved in vandalizing Liberation War sculptures. The signatories, comprising academics from various universities, human rights advocates, lawyers, writers, and civil society representatives, highlighted that the statue was incomplete when the district administration initiated its removal, citing a 'flimsy excuse' without prior discussion. This action has caused significant public anger. The statement noted that an anti-liberation group had previously vandalized the unfinished sculpture on August 5, 2024. The subsequent move to remove the partially repaired statue, instead of completing its restoration, is deemed irresponsible and highly objectionable. While the administration cited accident prevention as a reason, no consultation was held with the martyr's family or local civil society. The signatories believe that removing the statue of Bir Shrestha Hamidur Rahman, a hero of the Liberation War, amounts to disrespect. They urge for its reinstatement in its original location with due honor and call for similar initiatives to repair and reinstall other vandalized Liberation War sculptures across the country, alongside demanding legal action against perpetrators.
The incident surrounding the Bir Shrestha Hamidur Rahman statue in Jhenaidah highlights a recurring tension between historical commemoration and administrative action, often exacerbated by a lack of public consultation. The demand for legal action against vandals and the restoration of the statue underscores a societal imperative to honor national heroes and preserve the legacy of the Liberation War. However, the administration's justification for removal, even if citing safety concerns, without engaging affected communities or families, suggests a potential disconnect in governance processes. Moving forward, establishing clearer protocols for the installation, maintenance, and potential relocation of public monuments, involving diverse stakeholders from the outset, could mitigate such conflicts and ensure that national heritage is respected and protected through transparent and inclusive dialogue, preventing the politicization of historical symbols.
AI-generated to prompt reflection — not editorial opinion, not advice, not a statement of fact. How this works.