Prosecutors Seek Murder Conviction for Rope Jump Death, Citing Negligence and Profit Motive
The Public Prosecutor's Office of São Paulo (MP-SP) has requested the conviction of four individuals for homicide with eventual intent in the death of 21-year-old Maria Eduarda Rodrigues de Freitas. The young woman tragically died on June 13 after falling from the Esqueleto Bridge, located between Limeira and Cordeirópolis in São Paulo state, during a rope jump activity without a safety rope. Prosecutors allege that the organizers were aware of the inherent risks but deliberately neglected essential safety protocols, such as equipment checks, and legal requirements. Instead of prioritizing participant safety, they allegedly focused on profit and social media promotion for the extreme sport event.
The MP-SP's complaint, filed on Tuesday, revealed that the organizers were conducting between 80 and 100 jumps daily without adequate safety structures. The formal irregularities included operating the rope jump commercially without registration in the Ministry of Tourism's Cadastur registry, failing to secure civil liability insurance, and not obtaining signed risk acknowledgment forms from participants. The prosecution is seeking R$ 200,000 in damages and has requested the continued preventive detention of three male defendants and the conversion of the organizer's temporary detention into preventive detention. The accused are currently under investigation and have not yet been convicted.
According to the MP, Luis Felipe Feliciano Egoroff, Maicon Fernandes Cintra, and Vitor de Freitas Gonçalves allegedly launched the victim without connecting the safety rope to her harness, leading to a fatal fall of approximately 30 meters and subsequent politrauma. The fourth individual, Evelyne dos Santos Gonçalves, the event organizer, is accused of the same homicide charge through improper omission, as she allegedly failed to halt the activity despite knowing of a similar past operational failure. She also faces charges of procedural fraud for allegedly attempting to destroy evidence, specifically the GoPro camera used by the victim, which remains missing. The defense for two of the accused contests the murder charge, arguing their actions were negligent rather than intentional, while the defense for the organizer stated they would respond in due course.
This case highlights a critical tension between the pursuit of profit in the extreme sports industry and the fundamental obligation to ensure participant safety. The prosecution's focus on 'eventual intent' suggests a legal framework that holds organizers accountable for foreseeable risks arising from gross negligence, even without direct intent to cause harm. The alleged disregard for basic safety checks, regulatory compliance, and insurance points to a systemic failure in risk management, potentially driven by a desire to minimize operational costs and maximize revenue. Looking ahead, such incidents underscore the increasing need for robust regulatory oversight and stringent enforcement within the adventure tourism sector, especially as digital platforms amplify marketing reach and potentially obscure operational realities. The legal process will determine accountability, but the underlying issue of balancing commercial viability with public safety remains a significant challenge for this industry.
AI-generated to prompt reflection — not editorial opinion, not advice, not a statement of fact. How this works.