Reader questions guaranteed minimum income for authors, citing lack of interest in their works

A reader has responded to a previous suggestion for a guaranteed minimum income for authors, drawing a parallel to the 'intermittent du spectacle' system for performing artists in France. The reader questions whether authors should receive a guaranteed income, particularly for books deemed to be of little interest. This perspective raises a debate about the value and marketability of literary works in relation to author compensation. The core of the argument rests on the perceived quality and potential readership of an author's output as a factor in determining their financial support. It implies that a universal income for all authors might not be equitable if the works themselves do not garner significant attention or critical acclaim. This viewpoint suggests a need for a more nuanced approach to author remuneration, potentially linking it to factors beyond mere publication. The reader's comment highlights a tension between supporting creative professions and ensuring public funds or industry resources are allocated to works with demonstrable merit or audience engagement. The question posed is whether a baseline income should be provided regardless of an author's success or the perceived value of their books.