Timemania Lottery: Results for Contest 2417 and Winning Numbers Announced
The Timemania lottery's 2417 contest, held on Sunday, February 19th, has concluded without a grand prize winner for the seven correct numbers. The winning numbers drawn were 8, 12, 51, 56, 72, 75, and 80, with Aparecidense/GO selected as the 'Time do Coração' (Favorite Team). Consequently, the jackpot has rolled over and is now estimated at R$ 4.5 million for the next draw. While no one achieved seven correct numbers, one ticket matched six numbers, earning R$ 101,658.34. Additionally, 110 tickets with five correct numbers each received R$ 1,320.23. Smaller prizes were awarded to 1,976 tickets with four correct numbers (R$ 10.50 each) and 18,089 tickets with three correct numbers (R$ 3.50 each). The 'Time do Coração' prize was won by 5,152 participants, each receiving R$ 8.50. The next Timemania drawing is scheduled for Tuesday, February 21st. Playing Timemania involves selecting 10 numbers from 80 and one favorite team; prizes are awarded for matching three to seven numbers or the chosen team. The cost per ticket is R$ 3.50, with options for 'Surpresinha' (quick pick) and 'Teimosinha' (repeat play).
This report details the outcome of a national lottery draw, a common form of public entertainment and revenue generation. The rollover of the jackpot signifies a significant accumulation of funds, potentially increasing future participation. Lottery mechanics, like the 'Time do Coração' element, can introduce unique engagement factors beyond simple number matching. The structured prize distribution, including smaller awards for partial matches and the favorite team selection, ensures broader prize dissemination and maintains player interest across various tiers of success. Such lotteries, often managed by state-affiliated entities like Caixa Econômica Federal, operate within a framework of regulated chance, providing both entertainment and a mechanism for public funding, while the odds of winning substantial prizes remain statistically low.
AI-generated to prompt reflection — not editorial opinion, not advice, not a statement of fact. How this works.